Need help? We are here

  • +1 (304) 397-0675
  • support@brainiacessays.com

MARKING RUBRIC NURS2003 Assignment 1 –Pathophysiology and Pharmacology Glossary Student Name: Performance standard Assessment criteria Weighting Exceeds standard Meets standard Below standard Pathophysiology and Pharmacology 40 Ten outstanding glossary terms that display a thorough understanding of the pathophysiology or pharmacology demonstrated by accurate, highly relevant information provided with clear, succinct explanation of disease pathogenesis or pharmacology. (33.5-40)  Ten in the glossary terms that give a clear explanation of the pathophysiology or pharmacology terms presented as evidenced by a generalised demonstration of pathophysiology / pharmacology knowledge. Information mostly relevant, some details absent or incorrect. MARKING RUBRIC NURS2003 Assignment 1 –Pathophysiology and Pharmacology Glossary Student Name: Performance standard Assessment criteria Weighting Exceeds standard Meets standard Below standard Pathophysiology and Pharmacology 40 Ten outstanding glossary terms that display a thorough understanding of the pathophysiology or pharmacology demonstrated by accurate, highly relevant information provided with clear, succinct explanation of disease pathogenesis or pharmacology. (33.5-40)  Ten in the glossary terms that give a clear explanation of the pathophysiology or pharmacology terms presented as evidenced by a generalised demonstration of pathophysiology / pharmacology knowledge. Information mostly relevant, some details absent or incorrect. (20-33)  Less than ten glossary terms or poor explanation of pathophysiology or pharmacology terms. Poor understanding and inadequate knowledge demonstrated. Many details absent or incorrect (0-19.5)  Definitions used in context of the word / phrase 30 Detailed, concise, accurate, highly relevant, clear and appropriate definitions. Clear, concise and appropriate use in context of the word / phrase (25.5-30)  One – three entries lack relevance or clarity. Some details absent, ambiguous or incorrect. Clear and appropriate use in context of the word / phrase (15-25)  Definitions are not clear or appropriate. Details are absent, ambiguous or incorrect. Student unable to clearly and succinctly link context / use of the word / phrase. At times incorrect. Poor /lack of knowledge demonstrated. Information missing or irrelevant (0-14.5) Critical thinking /rationale and writing style 10 Clarity of thought and linking of ideas clearly demonstrated. Writing flows well, it is easy to read and follow the sequence of ideas. No spelling or grammatical errors throughout entry. Word count is adhered to. (8-10)  Reasonable clarity of thought and linking of ideas demonstrated. Writing mainly flows well, it is mainly easy to read and follow the sequence of ideas. Has no more than 3 incorrect ideas. No more than 5 spelling or grammatical errors throughout all ten entries. Word count mostly adhered to. (5-7.5)  Poor clarity of thought and linking of ideas demonstrated. Writing may flow or not but has multiple spelling and or grammatical errors throughout the ten entries. Students unclear with their ideas, demonstrate lack of knowledge in their entries. Word count excessive or inadequate (0-4.5)  MARKING RUBRIC NURS2003 Assignment 1 –Pathophysiology and Pharmacology Glossary Referencing 10 Correct use of the school style of referencing More than 8 credible references used including a mix of textbooks, websites and evidence based literature (8-10)  Mostly correct use of the school style of referencing AT least 5-8 credible references used including a mix of textbooks, websites and evidence based literature (5-7.5)  Incorrect/or inconsistent use of the school style of referencing. Mix of textbooks, websites and evidence based literature missing. Minimal references used. Overreliance on poor quality websites. (0-4.5)  Mark / Grade Date: Name of marker: Overall comment (20-33)  Less than ten glossary terms or poor explanation of pathophysiology or pharmacology terms. Poor understanding and inadequate knowledge demonstrated. Many details absent or incorrect Due date 10/02/17 not 13/02/17 (0-19.5)  Definitions used in context of the word / phrase 30 Detailed, concise, accurate, highly relevant, clear and appropriate definitions. Clear, concise and appropriate use in context of the word / phrase (25.5-30)  One – three entries lack relevance or clarity. Some details absent, ambiguous or incorrect. Clear and appropriate use in context of the word / phrase (15-25)  Definitions are not clear or appropriate. Details are absent, ambiguous or incorrect. Student unable to clearly and succinctly link context / use of the word / phrase. At times incorrect. Poor /lack of knowledge demonstrated. Information missing or irrelevant (0-14.5) Critical thinking /rationale and writing style 10 Clarity of thought and linking of ideas clearly demonstrated. Writing flows well, it is easy to read and follow the sequence of ideas. No spelling or grammatical errors throughout entry. Word count is adhered to. (8-10)  Reasonable clarity of thought and linking of ideas demonstrated. Writing mainly flows well, it is mainly easy to read and follow the sequence of ideas. Has no more than 3 incorrect ideas. No more than 5 spelling or grammatical errors throughout all ten entries. Word count mostly adhered to. (5-7.5)  Poor clarity of thought and linking of ideas demonstrated. Writing may flow or not but has multiple spelling and or grammatical errors throughout the ten entries. Students unclear with their ideas, demonstrate lack of knowledge in their entries. Word count excessive or inadequate (0-4.5)  MARKING RUBRIC NURS2003 Assignment 1 –Pathophysiology and Pharmacology Glossary Referencing 10 Correct use of the school style of referencing More than 8 credible references used including a mix of textbooks, websites and evidence based literature (8-10)  Mostly correct use of the school style of referencing AT least 5-8 credible references used including a mix of textbooks, websites and evidence based literature (5-7.5)  Incorrect/or inconsistent use of the school style of referencing. Mix of textbooks, websites and evidence based literature missing. Minimal references used. Overreliance on poor quality websites. (0-4.5)  Mark / Grade Date: Name of marker: Overall comment Patho and Pharma assignment EACH WORD MUST HAVE ITS OWN REFERENCE BECAUSE .MODE OF SUBMITION IS ONE AT A TIME, INTEXT REFERENCE AND FINAL REFERENCE FOR EACH WORD. Do not combine them a pace in between to be able to copy and paste for submission PATHOPHYSIOLOGY GLOSSARY ECZEMA CARDIOEMBOLIC STROKE ANGIOTENSINOGEN SUBDURAL HAEMORRHAGE NEUTROPAENIA PHARMACOLOGY GLOSSARY DRUG TOLERANCEBETA- ADRENERGIC BLOCKING AGENT AMINOGLYCOSIDES SEROTONINRECEPTOR AGONIST P-GLYCOPROTEIN

Connect with a professional writer in 5 simple steps

Please provide as many details about your writing struggle as possible

Academic level of your paper

Type of Paper

When is it due?

How many pages is this assigment?