Explan how Logical fallacies undermine effectiveness

Broad review of features and principles of arguments ● Narrative elements and structure ○ Used naturally by audiences to evaluate via narrative probability and narrative fidelity ● Audiences should be accounted for and appealed to ○ Universal audience, specific audiences, unintended audiences ○ Use of ethos, pathos or logos as appropriate ● Elements of argument offer opportunities for critique or improvement ○ What is the claim, the support/grounds/evidence, the warrants and backing, the rebuttals, qualifiers/modalities ● Types of arguments connect to tests of logic and reasoning ○ Argument by example, analogy, causal correlation, and sign ● Analysis can reveal weaknesses or misunderstandings ○ Propositions of fact, value or policy? ○ Basic analysis: factual conjecture, definitions, qualities, objections ○ Stock issues analysis: ill, blame, cure, cost, conclusion ○ Are we trying to analyze or critique the whole system? If so, assess components, relationships, goals, and effects Broad review of features and principles of arguments ● Language choices impact effectiveness ○ Word choices: denotative and connotative meanings, abstractions, metaphors ○ Storytelling choices: characters (descriptions, roles, types), settings (descriptions, types), events and actions (descriptions, types) ● Logical fallacies undermine effectiveness ● Grounds for argument can impact effectiveness ○ Premises: personal knowledge, cultural knowledge, rituals, symbols, presumptions ○ Examples: personal or from elsewhere, detailed or brief (should be: significant number, relevant, typical of the category, account for negative or rival examples) ○ Statistics: systematically derived, descriptive or inferential (should note: method of gathering, category definitions, time frame for data collection & analysis, percentages and ratios put in context) ○ Testimony: descriptive or interpretive, assessed via competence (ability), trustworthiness (motives) ● Refutation of your own or others’ arguments is useful practice ○ Critically evaluate support, errors, obfuscation, equivocations ○ Refute via denial, mitigation, reduce to absurdity or turn the tables ○ Present via declaration or questioning ● Visual elements can enhance or undermine claim, or make a claim on their own 

#Explan #Logical #fallacies #undermine #effectiveness

Table of Contents

Calculate your order
Pages (275 words)
Standard price: $0.00

Latest Reviews

Impressed with the sample above? Wait there is more

Related Questions

This case raises important issues.

This case raises important issues in market research and service pricing.  A Class A minor league baseball team has started up in Springfield, Massachusetts and

 You will see that you can choose from topics like

 You will see that you can choose from topics like conflict management, leadership styles, nonverbal communication, creativity in the workplace, communication climates, negotiation, decsion-making, problem-solving,

Description of a hypothetical program

Using the NACCHO link, review each section of the Mobilizing for Action through Planning and Partnerships (MAPP) framework. Using the same public health issue from previous weeks (Drug

Two new wind-farm tower projects

1.  Payback Analysis Two new wind-farm tower projects are proposed for a small company that installs them in south western Pennsylvania. Project A will cost $250,000

New questions

Don't Let Questions or Concerns Hold You Back - Make a Free Inquiry Now!