Review of paper should be approximately 3 pages typed, double-spaced (12 pt. font, Times New Roman), with standard 1-inch margins on all sides. The review paper should not only provide a synopsis (“summary”) of the paper. The review paper should also 1) highlight the strengths and weaknesses, if any, of the paper, 2) give suggestions for what you would have done differently, and 3) provide some future directions, of your own, for the research presented in the paper (what would you do next, if you were the authors?).
How will you use the processes from ARDP 6-22 to improve the ABCT and
What is the critical leadership problem facing the 4th ABCT? How will you use the processes from ARDP 6-22 to improve the ABCT and achieve