Need help? We are here


 Reflect upon the “Forensic Application of DNA Evidence and the Collection of Evidence (Part 2)” and answer the following questions:

In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993), the Supreme Court held that the Federal Rules of Evidence superseded Frye as the standard for admissibility of expert evidence in federal courts. There are some states that still adhere to the Frye standard.
What are the major components of the “Federal Rules of Evidence”?
What are the major differences between the “Frye” standard and the Federal Rules of Evidence?
Why do some states still adopt the “Frye” standard over the Federal Rules of Evidence?
Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA style, these do not count towards the minimum word amount
References: At least two references are required